What to Look For
Conference vs Journal
It is critical that dual-track submissions are earnestly considered for both tracks; in doing so it might be helpful to consider the question “Would I still accept this if it was ineligible for the conference papers track?” The official approved proposal for the conference papers program is here.
Ethics & Professionalism
ACM & Eurographics Digital Libraries
When You’re Done
- Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. A. Tomkins, M. Zhang, and W.D. Heavlin. PNAS, 2017, 114 (48). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114
- Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review. C. Le Goues, Y. Brun, S. Apel, E. Berger, S. Khurshid, Y. Smaragdakis. Communications of the ACM, 2018, 61 (6), https://doi.org/10.1145/3208157